The purpose of HC tests is to recognize the immunologic risk of a TR in the context of a possible donor. If Tx occurs between genetically different in
HLA sensitization and crossmatch testing
Abbreviations:
o
HC: histocompatibility.
o
MHC: major
histocompatibility complex.
o
HLAs: the human
leukocyte antigens.
o
DSA: donor-specific
anti-HLA antibody.
o
CDC: complement-dependent
cytotoxic.
o
KTx: kidney transplantation.
o
SAB: single-antigen
bead.
o
AB: antibodies.
o
Ag: antigen
o
CX: crossmatch.
o
Bld Tx: blood
transfusions.
o
im/m: Immunosuppression.
o
TR: transplant
recipient.
o
SOT: solid organ Tx.
o
KTx: kidney
transplant.
o cPRA: The calculated panel of reactive antibody.
o Snz: sensitization
o DCD: deceased-donor.
o Chr: Chromosome.
o FCM: flow cross matches
The purpose of HC tests is to recognize the immunologic risk of
a TR in
the context of a possible donor. If Tx occurs between genetically different
individuals, the allogeneic graft (allograft) is identified as a foreign primarily
owing to the difference between donor/TR MHC molecules that are known also as the HLAs. The developed immune response observed
via 2 main
mechanisms: T cell-mediated (cellular) response & AB-mediated (humoral) response. The current HC tests are focusing primarily on anticipating
the AB-mediated alloimmune response.
In human being, the MHC genes are involved on the short arm of Chr 6 & include the class I, HLA-A, HLA-B, & HLA-C, and class II
genes, HLA-DPA1, HLA-DPB1, HLA-DQA1, HLA-DQB1, HLA-DRA, HLA-DRB1, HLA-DRB3, HLA-DRB4, & HLA-DRB5. Class I molecules
are being expressed on any nucleated cell, whilst class II molecules are being expressed mainly on Ag-presenting cells (e.g., B
cell, dendritic cell,
& macrophage) but can be also
expressed with inflammatory states on variable cell types that includes endothelial cell
& epithelial cell.
In SOT,
a "mismatching"
refers to an HLA Ag(s) present on the cells of the donor’s
allograft but not present in the TR.
The higher the disparity between the donor & TR,
the greater "foreign" the allograft appearance and the increased
likelihood of the evolution of an allo-immune responses. In the subset of DCD KTx
allocation, only the HLA-A, HLA-B, & HLA-DR loci are tested for mismatching. Accuracy
in typing of a donor's & recipient's HLAs is
crucial in recognizing the magnitude of mismatching between them and in discarding the
tx of potential donors’ organs that express HLA Ag
against which the TR has developed AB(s).
In certain ptns it is better to discard
exposing a potential candidate to certain organ bearing mismatched HLA Ag against
which the potential candidate with prior formation of AB.
HLA typing
was previously proceeded via serology-based
assessment, but this has been substituted by the application of the DNA-based
molecular technique that provides a better
resolution and more accuracy in
the typing of all loci.
Almost 30 % of ptns on the waiting list are proved to have AB(s) directed against one or more HLAs, owing to prior sensitization due to previous exposures, e.g.,:
1) Bld Tx,
2) Prior Tx,
3) Pregnancy, &
Implants e.g., [ventricular assisting device & homograft].
The purpose of screening ptns for anti-HLA AB before Tx:
1) Recognizing
the presence of anti-HLA AB (s),
2) Estimating
their specificity to certain HLA Ag (s), &
3) Determining
their relative amounts and their potential strength.
These basal data will assist the physician in
assessment:
1) The
likelihood to receive an HLA-compatible
Tx,
2) Recognizing
the "unaccepted Ags" & avoiding grafts with these Ag(s), &
3) Identifying
ptns with higher immunologic risk and providing more
aggressive im/m. plan and/or more
strict post-tx surveillance.
The cPRA
is a method enabling the clinician assessing a ptn's magnitude of Snz
to HLA Ag(s)
and consequently the likelihood for Tx. The cPRA can calculate the likelihood of tx via interpreting
the results of the SAB assay to recognize
the specificity of the anti-HLA AB, combined with the known frequency of HLA Ag(s) within the donor cohorts.
The purpose of CX
assay is to recognize any prior DSA found
in a ptn's serum and directed against a specific donor.
Cell-based assay e.g., CDC CX
& FCM
are usually proceeded tx to decide whether ptn is amenable to proceed in
tx. Results of ALL HLA tests should be incorporated to assess the
potential immunologic risk between
a donor & TR pair. Moreover, the decision to postpone or
proceed with Tx should also take into consideration the associated clinical criteria e.g.,
1) Donor
issues.
2) Tx organ
type,
3) How urgent
is Tx,
4) Type
of im/m. regimen for a potential TR, &
5) Availability
of receiving a compatible graft.
COMMENTS