Uremic toxins
Uremic toxins
Uremic
syndrome is a
complex mixture of clinical changes that can be attributed to one or more of variable solutes retained
in uremia/CKD.
Database concerned with the nature & kinetic
behavior of these compounds may be beneficial with the advent of a de
novo therapeutic agent introduced in the future. A constellation of
factors that have frequently been omitted, may interfere with the uremic solute levels
and their effect on physiological functions:
1) Traditional
sources of uremic solutes ma include dietary
protein metabolism, additional sources e.g. environmental contamination, food additives, traditional stimulants (coffee, tea),
herbal medications, or addiction to psychedelic
agents may have their roles in uremic toxicity.
2) A
variety of solutes have a toxic capacity to invade the body via the intestinal root. Alterations
in the composition of intestinal microbiota or changes in intestinal
production, absorptive capacity,
transfer, and metabolism may interfere with serum levels of these toxins.
3) Certain
uremic solutes can interfere with the functions that directly impact the biochemical action
of other substances (e.g., the expression of parathyroid hormonal [PTH] receptors, the response to 1, 25 (OH)2
vit. D3, in addition to the protein binding and
breakdown of many other solutes).
4) Most
ptns with RF use multiple drugs. Interaction of these agents with protein
binding and/or tubular clearance of
uremic solutes may impact their biological effect their biological effect.
5) Lipophilic components may be responsible at least partially on functional alterations of uremia; these are inadequately cleared
by current DX programs.
6) The major strategy on
current use to limit the uremic solute levels is dialysis.
However, DX is NOT specific and
can also remove the essential components.
7) Uremic
solutes accumulation occurs not only in the plasma but also intracellular, where biological activity
is mostly in action. Removal of intracellular
components during DX through the cell membrane may
be impeded, leading to many compartmental
kinetics & impaired detoxification, unless DX duration and/or frequency have been augmented.
Biochemical changes can be triggered by a broad spectrum of
components:
1) Some:
small &
water soluble (e.g., urea, guanidines,
phosphate, oxalate).
2)
Some: lipophilic and/or protein
bound (e.g., p-cresyl sulfate, homocysteine,
indoles).
3) Some:
larger with
a middle-molecule range (e.g., beta2-microglobulin, PTH).
4) Some
components of one group can affect generation/behavior of other comp-onents from another one
(e.g., guanidines can increase generation of TNFa).
Optimal clearance for each type of molecule may
be obtained with a different type of extracorporeal
therapy (e.g., via large-pore membranes
and/or dialyzers or devices with a high
adsorptive capacity for some or several
of the uremic toxins). Adsorption
with DX devices currently available is of little importance. More specific
devices with large surface areas must be developed before adequate adsorption
can be obtained
Solute levels is also controlled
by intestinal intake & preserved kidney function:
1) Intestinal uptake can be decreased by dietary uptake
control, via oral sorbents,
or via intestinal flora control by adding of prebiotics or probiotics.
2) Preserving
residual kidney function may also crucial to guarantee more removal of retention solutes.
3) Therapeutic
maneuvers by adding drugs countering biological effect of uremic solutes.
Lastly, choosing marker
molecules for retained uremic toxins &
dialytic removal should be reevaluated. It has been increasingly clear
that the current markers, which are
all small, water-soluble compounds (urea, creatinine), are NOT always
representing their kinetic behavior for middle
molecules, lipophilic/protein-bound
components, and even other hydrosoluble components.
Nevertheless, it may be realistic to admit another
marker that is representing ALL solutes
or that are responsible for the manifestation of uremic
syndrome.
COMMENTS