Complications of Transplantation
COVID-19 and solid organ
transplant (SOT).
COVID-19 poses new
challenges for individual SOT candidates
& transplant recipients (TR), as
well as the process of SOT. There’s currently
a theoretical risk of transmitting SARS-CoV-2 (virus responsible of COVID-19)
from an organ donor to TR based upon detection
of viral RNA particles in organs that can be transplanted (eg, lung, heart, kidney, intestine), despite donor-derived infection has not been
observed to date. Owing to this risk with possibility of transmitting SARS-CoV-2 to
health care providers, all solid
organ donor
and TR should be screened for COVID-19 by
history, chest imaging & microbiologic
testing. Post-tx, SOT recipients
may be at increased risk for acquisition of COVID-19
as they’re immunocompromised (im/m) and have frequent contact with
health care system, although this link has not been studied. Clinical pivture of
COVID-19 in
SOT recipients are variable and
similar to that seen in non-im/m ptns. However, fever appears to be less
common. Whether disease course is more severe is not known.
COVID-19 and solid organ transplant (SOT).
COVID-19 poses new
challenges for individual SOT candidates
& transplant recipients (TR), as
well as the process of SOT. There’s currently
a theoretical risk of transmitting SARS-CoV-2 (virus responsible of COVID-19)
from an organ donor to TR based upon detection
of viral RNA particles in organs that can be transplanted (eg, lung, heart, kidney, intestine), despite donor-derived infection has not been
observed to date. Owing to this risk with possibility of transmitting SARS-CoV-2 to
health care providers, all solid
organ donor
and TR should be screened for COVID-19 by
history, chest imaging & microbiologic
testing. Post-tx, SOT recipients
may be at increased risk for acquisition of COVID-19
as they’re immunocompromised (im/m) and have frequent contact with
health care system, although this link has not been studied. Clinical pivture of
COVID-19 in
SOT recipients are variable and
similar to that seen in non-im/m ptns. However, fever appears to be less
common. Whether disease course is more severe is not known.
RENAL TRANSPLANTATION
﴾﴾ V. Complications of Transplantation. ﴿﴿
Q.739. How to evaluate anemia in a renal transplant recipient?
A. Anemia: a common finding
before & after R.Tx.
It’s most often rel. to: [iron def., graft Rj or dysfunction, Epo
deficiency, viral infection, im/m. & infc. Prox.] Evaluation of anemic R.Tx recip.
incl.: assessment for causes of anemia shared é non-Tx. ptn. & for more sp. causes tht may be unique
to R.Tx.. To exclude non-renal
causes of anemia , evaluation shd incl.:[RBCs
indices, Retics., s. iron, TIBC ,%
TSAT, s. ferritin & bld in stool].
However, inflmm.Øêê
TSAT & incr. ferritin, obscuring
diagnostic utility of these tests. Initial assessment shd
incl. a review of potential causative medications & P.H. of bld
loss/hemolysis. Prior to ESA thpy, ensure ironrepletion: F{s. ferritin> 200 ng/mL & TSAT >20 %}. If ptn. is iron deficient, give i.v. iron.
Because of lower
expense
&
ability to give larger
dose, we cn use INFeD
brand of iron dextran as iron infusion of choice. We prefer
not to use Dexferrum brand of iron dextran (higher
m.w.) due to a higher
incid. of adverse
effects. We us. give 25 mg test dose in 50 mL of N.S. i.v., é
precautions for ttt of anaphylactic reaction.
If tolerated, give 1000
mg by slow i.v. infusion.
This’s us. done dur. initial Tx. hospitalization stay. This cn be repeated
as necess-ary in an outpatient infusion center to maintain HB > 10
g/dL, s. ferritin > 200 ng/mL
& TSAT>20 %.
Alternatively, we cn give ferumoxytol (Feraheme)
as 510 mg rapid
inj. at visits (separated by at least 3-8 d.).
If ptn is allergic to
iron dextran, we give ferumoxytol (Feraheme) as two 510
mg rapid inj. about one w. apart. Alternatively, give Na ferric gluconate cx: 250 mg on 4 different occasions,
us. weekly/4 w.,
or iron sucrose 300 mg IV over 2 h. on 3 separate occasions, separat-ed by 14 d. Adv.
of iron sucroseü : unlike
iron dextran,
No
fatal
anaphylactic reactions,
but are more expensive & less
convenient thn a single
iron
dextran.
Persistent
anemia: assess iron status /8-12 w.. Oral iron hs bn inadequate to replace or keep adequate iron
stores & may bind7é im/m., (e.g. MMF). We do not use ESA in the immediate Tx.
period. With CKD anemia occ. > 3 m. post Tx in iron-replete ptn.Øinitiate Epoa. Ptn. shd be apprised A of risks ofÖ: {Stroke,
thrombotic events &
incr. risk of recurrent cancer} prior to ESA.
In U.S., Medicare guidelines
mandate CKD
ptn receive ESA in
a physician's office, wch’s inconvenient for the ptn.. Instead of Epo a., an
alternative is to use darbepoetin
alfa (Aranesp)
because of its longer half-life tht may
permit less frequent doses. Depo. carries the same risks as other ESAs. Initiate Depo. 0.45 mcg/kg S.Q,
wch’s given once/w.. However, Depo. is more expensive.
Q.740. What causes elevation of the lipid profile in R.T.x.? B
A. Csp. (replace é tacrolimus), Sirolimus & Steroid therapy.
Q.741. How can u suspect R.V.T.?
A. { Abrupt anuria. + Loin pain. +é LDH + Doppler evidence =
R.V.T.}.
Q.742. When should
the diagnosis of T.M.A.
be suspected?
A. The constellation of (3 high+2 Low) : { B + A }
1. Incr. s. cr.
2. Incr. LDH.
3. Incr. Schistocytes in blood film.
4.
Low HB.
5. Low platelet count.
Q.743. What
is the D.D.? How to solve this problem? {Ñ}
A. T.M.A. cn be mistaken é :
1. “Lab”. changes …. us. ”mild”.
2. Sirolimus & thymoglobulin
toxicity:Ø [Anemia +
thrombocytopenia].
A. R. biopsyØ {Endothelial dge +
arterial microangiopathy} é T.M.A.,…. prognosis is poor.
Q.744. How to treat this problem?
A. T.M.A. cn be caused
by: B
1. A.P.A ð Pph + anticoacgulants.
2. C.N.I. ð Change
the drug.
3. Recurrence of the original dis.
(esp. non-Drr.
HUS.) ð Pph.
Q.745. What
are the causes of post R.Tx. R.A.S?
A. Post R.Tx. RAS Ø B
1. Surgical trauma.
2. Atherosclerosis.
3.
CMV.
Dgx: similar to general
population. As Sn & Sm of COVID-19 may be subtle in TR and disease progression can be rapid, some physicians hv a lower threshold for
evaluating & testing TR. Approach to management
(eg, antivirals, supportive care) is also similar to general
population, although careful attention should be paid to possibility drug-drug
interactions & effects on the im/m regimen. Adjustments to im/m protocol should
be individualized, based according to
disease severity, specific regimen
used, type
of organ transplant, time post-tx, and risk of acute allograft rejection. Some organ TR recover without reduction in im/m.
that carries the risk of rejection & immune reconstitution.
Conversely, continued im/m. may enhance the risk of uncontrolled
infection.
COMMENTS