Q.640. Why Kt/V & creatinine clearance may not be correlated in continuous P.D.?
PERITONEAL DIALYSIS
Q.640. Why Kt/V & creatinine clearance may not be correlated in continuous P.D.?
A. Until
now the best yardstick for P.D. adequacy remains to be determined.
Whereas prev. recomm. sugg.: use of either urea or cr. kinetics, 2006 NKF-K/ DOQI G.L. recomm.: Kt/Vurea target
(ie, urea kinetics) only.
Alth. Cr. cl. & Kt/V us. correlate, they’re not
infrequently discrepant. Both DX. & Kru affect both Cr. Cl. & Kt/V. Ratio of Cr. Cl.-to-Kt/V is higher
in ptn é Kru & falls if he became anuric.
Ch.ch. of Pr. membrane
transport may affect the relationship between Cr. cl. &
Kt/V. For shorter dwells, esp. in low transporters, urea
clearance per dwell exceeds tht for Cr.. Whereas weekly Kt/V is independent
of transporter type, weekly Cr. Cl. ê
progressively fr. high to low transporters. It’s
important to be aware of Pr. membrane transport ch.ch. of individual ptn when
writing PD prescription & interpreting solute clearance results. Ptn wt
hs a greater effect on Kt/V thn on Cr. Cl.. {A dcr. or incr. in wt Ø Kt/V
to incr. or dcr., resp.}. So, Kt/V is often at or above target
values in malnourished ptn & low in obese ptn. Using the desired
rather thn actual wt Ø more accurate results.
Q.641. How to estimate the adequacy
of peritoneal dialysis?
A. Ssc:
(Minimal
total Small Solute Clearance) target values:
minimal weekly target clearance (Kt/V urea & Cr.
cl.) hv bn published by U.S. & international societies. A general
consensus prev. recmm. target weekly DX. dose are not needed,
wch may unnecessarilyØ transferred to HDX
bec. of inadequate DX. é PD.
ADEMEX study & Hong Kong trial hv
shown: using standard P.D. regimens, attempts to maintain prev.
recmm.: Ssc goals are not necessary. NKF-KDOQI 2006 guidelines revised the minimal
delivered Ssc goals: Ptn. é Kru (considered signif. if
ur. vol. >100 mL/d.E) the minimal
"delivered" dose of Ssc shd be total (PD & Kru)
Kt/Vurea of at least 1.7/w..Ptn.
without Kru (insignif.
if ur. vol. is <100
mL/d.), minimal "delivered"
dose of Ssc shd be at least 1.7/w. European
Best Practices Guidelines 2005 sugg.: minimum wkly target Kt/Vurea of 1.7.
The recmm. minimal delivered total Ssc
of Kt/Vurea shd be at least 1.7/w. for CAPD. Measures preserving Kru
is recommended. The minimal delivered total Ssc recomm. in the new
guidelines are correct based on current evidence.
A
requirement for higher values may be most applicable in U.S., a country
in wch higher adequacy goals may be necessary for a relatively older
& sicker ptn..In addition, higher values may be necessary in those
eating more protein who may hv a metabolic need for relatively higher
Ssc rates. In U.S., target doses sufficiently above minimum
threshold to ensure minimum level of DX. dose , delivered to all ptn. target
Kt/Vurea = 1.8/w..
Automated P.D.: No prospective trials available &
looking at relative risk of death in relationship to dose in APD . The 2006 K/DOQI work group: the higher targets
prev-iously recomm. are not required é APD. Minimal dose of Kt/Vurea shd be 1.7/w. for APD.
Once ptn is anuric , he shd undergo 24 h./d. PD
to optimize middle molecular wt solute clearance. This’s because
randomized trials hv only evaluated 24 h./d. PD. Calculation
of solute clearance: Weekly Kt/Vurea cn be estimated fr. the foll.: daily
Pr. urea clearance (Kt)= sum of product of all drain vol. (Pr.+ Kru)
+ ratio of urea conc. in the drained Dzt or urine to tht in pl. (D/P
urea). If there’s significant Kru (residual kid. vol.:>100 mL/d.), both Pr. & residual R. components
of Ssc are used in calculation.
Fluid
balance:ñbody
fluid ØñM.R. in P.D.. Fluid
overload shd be evaluated & adjust P.D. prescription. To improve
vol. status: [êdietary
sod.;
loop diuretics é
signif. Kru; and/or change
U.F. profile of long dwell or use aother osmotic ag.].
Q.642. What are the problems with solute clearance & U.F. in continuous P.D.?
A. Ch.
P.D. cn be complicated by A: inadequate “solute” clearance or ê U.F.. (1) Inadequate solute clearance:= [incr. BUN & pl. cr. or app. of
uremic Sms despite seemingly successful PD]. It may be caused by poor
compliance, high protein intake
or hypercatabolic state, or ê intrinsic
P.M. permeability. These causes cn be distinguished by PET.
Initial tttØ more intensive DX.,
achieved by é vol. of inflow Dzt/exchange.
If failed Ø transfer to H.DX..
(2)
Impaired U.F.:
ch.ch. by persistently low drain vol. after 4 h. of dwell. It’s
caused by é Pr. solute transport, wch
may be transient, due to Ac. peritonitis, or sustained,
often due to repeated episodes of peritonitis. Ptn é ê U.F. may be ttted by shortening
dwell time, or by using more freq. hypertonic exchanges. Other
options: instillation of icodextrin Dzt., or use of diuretics
in ptn. é Kru. Occ. ptn é U.F. failure may
require maintenance H.DX. via temporary C.V. cth..
Combination of N. or low
solute transport &
low
drain volumes sugg. Pr. cth. malfunction, extraPr.
Dzt. leakage, enhanced absorption by Pr. lymphatics or ê in
U.F. Co.. A dcr. U.F. Co. is rare, and may occ. in conj. é SEP.
Q.643. How to increase K/t.V. in P.D. patients?
A. Three tools to incr. K/tv.:
B
(1)
é No. of dwells. (Dwell= Exchange frequency).
(2) é Size of dwells.
(3)
Use Icodextrin é day time.
Q.644. What is Quantum? !
A. Quantiam: a device to check No. of dwells to check ptn. compliance in P.D.
A. Adequest: a formula developed by Baxter for evaluation of P.D adequacy.
Q.645. What is PET (Peritoneal equilibration
test)?
A. PET = [a semi-quantitative
assess. of Pr. Membrane” transport function”. ] Ratio of solute conc. in
Dzt & plasma (D/P ratio) at sp. times (t)
dur. dwell signifies the extent of solute equilibration. Four
categories are recognized: AA
1) High Transporter Ü Rapid Loss of
concentration gradient.
2)
High
Average.
3)
Low
Average.
4) Low transporter.
Q.646. How & when to do PET?
PET is a highly reproducible
procedure üü consisting of 4 h. DX. exch. é
DX.
solution. The standardized test measures Dzt cr. & glucose at 0, 2 & 4 h.
of dwell & S.cr. &
glucose at any time dur. the test. We perform a PET 1-2 w. after
initiation of P.D., as a baseline value. P
Clinical applications: to classify Pr. membrane
func. & assess reasons underlying inadequate DX. or UF. To best
assess UF failure, some recommend : modified PET Ø 2.5 % dextrose + 4.25% dextrose Ø maximal
osmotic drive. With this test, failure: defined as
[U.F. volume <400mL] after a 4 h. dwell with 2 L. of 4.25 % dextrose (3.86 %
glucose). It’s not customary to perform a PET dur. or after
episode of peritonitis as Ac. changes us. reversed after recoveryü.
Q.647. How frequent are abdominal hernias
occurring in continuous P.D.?
A. Hernia
rates in P.D. are currently rep.: 0.06-0.08
/ptn./y. Pathophysiology: Principal risk f. for hernia formation
reflect anatomic, hydrostatic, or metabolic f.s. Sm.s incl. [painless
swelling é different sites,
discomfort or disfigurement & problems related to hernia complc.]. Migration
of pr. fluid into other body structures cn c either abd. wall or genital
edema. More serious complc. are rare but incl.: small bowel obstruction
& intestinal incarceration and/or strangulation.
Measures taken pre- &
post-operative to ê risk of hernia & Dzt. leaks incl.: eval-uation
& repair of existing hernias, the location & procedures used for P.D.
cth. Placement & methods to ê
intra-abd. pressure in post-op. period. Ptns dev. hernia after initiation of PD
shd undergo elective repair. Use of a polypropylene
mesh prosthesis Øê risk
of post-op. hernia. Low-vol.
supine P.D. cn be resumed several d.s after repair. TTT of
Dzt. leak varies in ptn. é or
without ass. hernia. ttt of an uncomplc. Dzt. leak (é
no ass. hernia) cn initially be ttt.ed by temporarily stopping
PD, changing to low vol., supine, or dry day PD, or by short
term transfer to HDX. ttt of recurrent leaks depends on location &
etiology of the leak.
Q.648. what
is the role of P.D. in treatment of acute kidney injury (ARF)?
A. PD is an overlooked
procedure for dialytic support in AKI, Ac. PD remains a viable
option for ttt of selected ptn. é AKI.
This’s esp. true for hemodynamically compromised or hv sev. coagulation abn.
or when other modalities are not readily available. Compared é other available modalities, PD hs
several adv.
as a RRT in AKI. These incl.:[Wide availability, ease of
performance & access placement, ability to remove large amounts of fluid in
hemodynamically unstable ptn, easy & gradual correction of acid-base &
electrolyte imbalance, no need for anticoa-gulation and highly biocompatible].
There’re No. of
indications & C.I. for Ac. PD in AKI. Most are only relative
indications or relative C.I. for the technique. Ac. PD cn be performed
intermittently or continuously (depending
upon: desired fluid & solute removal) & either manually
or APD. Ac. manual PD is us. performed by nurs-es. By comparison,
automated device or cycler ê the
need for constant nursing supervision. Standard Ac. PD prescription incl.: {length of session, Dzt. Compos-ition, exchange vol.,
inflow & outflow (drain) periods, dwell time, No. of exchanges, Dzt
additives & adjusting fluid balance}.
Q.649. What are
the complications associated with acute PD?
A. Ac. P.D. complc., some are serious, life-threatening, many are preventable:
I. Mech. complications: Mostly
not serious, but mayØê DX.
Efficiency, wch incl.:
1) Abd. Pain/discomfort: Mild abd. pain/discomfort is common & us.
2ndry to abd. distention. Moderate/sev. pain us. due to cth.-related complc. or infc. .
2) Intraabd. hge: Mild bleeding is frequent & cn be obs. é cth. placement. However, sev.
intraabd. hge hs bn rep. fr. cth., partic. semirigid Ac. cth.
3) Leakage:
is common & ttt.: ê exchange vol. for 1st 24 h. Temporary cessation of PD may be necessary & bowel evacuation cn mitigate the
problem.
4) Inadequate drainage: us. due to êbowel motility. Bowel catharticsØ improve drainage, while manipulation of
cth. may occasionally be necessary.
5) Bowel perforation: Obs. é
semirigid Ac PD cth.ØSev.
abd. pain, bld-tinged Pr. effluent, intraabd. hge & (rarely) shock.
Bowel/fecal material cn be noted é effluent Dzt., ttt.: [Cessation of PD.,
cath. removal, i.v. A.B. & bowel repair].
II. Infc. complic.: Common, esp. peritonitis, wch cn be signif. dcr. by maintai-ning sterile precautions dur. cth. placement & preventing contamination dur. ex-changes. Leaking Dzt predisposes to peritonitis. Puncture site abscess cn result fr. bedside placement of Ac. PD cth., esp. missed attention to sterile technique.
III. “Pulmonary” complications:
1) Basal
atelectasis & pneumonia: cn result fr.é IAP ass. é
Ac. PD.Ø inadequ-ate
lung expansion & stasis of secretions.
2) Pl.
effusion: fluid migration È to thoracic cavity, hydrothorax, cn occ. é diaphragmtic defect or its lymphatics Ø Rt.
sided eff.(most
common). êIAP by ê exchange vol. & using supine position wil
help. Pleurodesis rarely required.
3) Aspiration : é intraPr. pressure predisposes to GERDØ é risk of aspiration.
IV.
CVS. complications:
1. Hypovolemia: due to excessive U.F.
2. Cardiac
arrhythmias:
due mostly to electrolyte
& metabolic disturbances, or diaphragmatic elevation.
V.
Metabolic complications:
1) Hyperglycemia.
2) Hypernatremia.
3) Hypoglycemia.
4) Hypokalemia: Standard PD solutions do not
contain K+, add K+
to Dzt.
VI. Protein loss: May exceed 5 g/d.. wch
incr. by aggressive U.F. & infection.
COMMENTS